A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: Attempt to read property "blog_child_category_id" on null

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 444

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 444
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: Attempt to read property "blog_child_category_subcategory_id" on null

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 446

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 446
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

questions Online: Edatabook
Analysis of GST Detention & Penalty Cases – Goods in Transit

Analysis of GST Detention & Penalty Cases – Goods in Transit

Blocked ITC under Rule 86A — grounds to challenge & recent court trends

Blocked ITC under Rule 86A — grounds to challenge & recent court trends

Taxation of ESOPs in Startups – Perquisites, Deferrals & Deductions

Taxation of ESOPs in Startups – Perquisites, Deferrals & Deductions

Major Relief for Taxpayers: Key Change Introduced in GSTR-9 for FY 2024–25

Major Relief for Taxpayers: Key Change Introduced in GSTR-9 for FY 2024–25

Normally, suppliers pay GST, but under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM), the recipient pays tax directly to the government on notified supplies or imports.

Normally, suppliers pay GST, but under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM), the recipient pays tax directly to the government on notified supplies or imports.

Punjab & Haryana High Court CWP No. 6654 of 2023 [Jiahua Declaration and Design Engineering India Pvt. Ltd. & Others v. Union of India & Others ]

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of the arrest and prosecution powers under the Haryana GST Act, alleging lack of legislative competence and violation of fundamental rights.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [Deputy Commissioner ST & Ors. V/s Wingtech Mobile Communications (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.]

We are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the High Court. However, we record the statement of Mr. Balbir Singh, learned senior counsel given on instructions that the undertaking, as indicated in the order passed by the High Court, will be given and that the amount deposited in the bank shall remain unaltered.

DELHI HIGH COURT {Namdhari Timmber Pvt. Ltd. Through Director Vajeer Singh V/s Union of India}

The petitioner challenged retrospective cancellation of GST registration from 01.07.2017. The Court held that where the show cause notice does not propose retrospective cancellation, such effect cannot be given. Following Subhana Fashion and Balaji Industries, the order was quashed. However, the Department is allowed to issue a fresh notice if non-existence is proved.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT [Uday Glass House V/s State of Uttar Pradesh and Another]

- The petitioner challenged a demand order under Section 73 passed without fresh notice after the earlier hearing date lapsed. The Court found that no further hearing opportunity or reasoned order was given. While setting aside the order, the Court directed a fresh hearing subject to 10% pre-deposit of disputed tax.

BOMBAY HIGH COURT [Ravi Steel Industries V/s Union of India and Others]

The petitioner contested dual proceedings initiated by Central authorities for FY 2017-18 and 2018-19, already covered by State GST assessments. , the Court held that parallel jurisdiction is barred under Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act and directed the Centre to consider petitioner’s objections before continuing adjudication.

Directorate of Cinchona & Other Medicinal Plants, Mungpoo, West Bengal

Directorate of Cinchona & Other Medicinal Plants, Mungpoo, West Bengal

Page: