A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: Attempt to read property "blog_child_category_id" on null

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 444

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 444
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: Attempt to read property "blog_child_category_subcategory_id" on null

Filename: controllers/Frontend.php

Line Number: 446

Backtrace:

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/application/controllers/Frontend.php
Line: 446
Function: _error_handler

File: /home/edatabook/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

questions Online: Edatabook
GST Portal Issue: Difficulty in Filing Appeals When Demand is Shown as NIL

GST Portal Issue: Difficulty in Filing Appeals When Demand is Shown as NIL

GSTAT-DELHI (PB) [DG Anti Profiteering, Director General of Anti-Profiteering, DGAP V/s IJM Raintree Park Pvt. Ltd]

Many taxpayers are facing difficulty in filing appeals on the GST portal when the order shows “NIL demand”, even though they want to dispute the tax liability.

GUJARAT-AAR [CPL Pharmaceuticals Private Limited Sushma Mora and Vishal Malani, Member]

M/s CPL Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. set up a new API manufacturing plant at Dahej, Gujarat. For installation of machinery like reactors, filters, dryers, boilers, and other equipment, strong RCC foundations and steel structures were constructed to provide stability, absorb vibrations, and ensure proper functioning.

GUJARAT-AAAR [Deputy Commissioner, Central GST, Ahmedabad Versus Shree Ambica Geotex Pvt]

M/s Shree Ambica Geotex Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in manufacturing geomembranes used for waterproof lining in applications like ponds and agriculture.

GSTAT-DELHI (PB) [DG Anti Profiteering, Director General of Antiprofiteering, DGAP V/s Samridhi Realty Pvt. Ltd]

The GSTAT held that no profiteering was established where the builder had already passed on ITC benefits exceeding the computed profiteering amount. Though DGAP initially determined profiteering of Rs.6.59 crore due to increased ITC ratio post-GST, it was found that the respondent had passed on Rs.16.45 crore to homebuyers. The complainants also acknowledged receipt of due benefits. The Tribunal accepted the DGAP report and concluded that provisions of Section 171 were not violated. The case highlights that anti-profiteering provisions are satisfied where actual benefit passed exceeds computed liability.

BOMBAY HIGH COURT [Sabre Travel Network (India) Pvt. Ltd V/s Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Finance ]

The present petition has been filed seeking various reliefs, primarily to declare that the petitioner should not be treated as an “intermediary” for the services rendered. The petitioner has also challenged the validity of the provision which deems the place of supply of such services to be in India, even when services are provided to recipients located outside India.

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT [Wastepe India Private Limited V/s Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax Act, Uttarakhand and another ]

The present writ petition was filed challenging an order whereby the authorities had confiscated the vehicle and goods of the petitioner.

GAUHATI HIGH COURT [Sarda Eco Power Ltd V/s The State of Assam]

The petitioner approached the Court challenging the cancellation of its GST registration and seeking its restoration.

Page: